Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation

[Alexander Terekhov]

chrisv http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/2007/09/chrisv-liar.html wrote:
> 
> Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> >On 2/10/2010 3:50 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >
> >> The idea is that by doing a few modifying and copyrightable changes into
> >> a "single program" in response to the GPL offer one becomes a joint
> >> copyright owner of the entire work "as a whole" and can rightfully
> >> license that entire work (with 'as a whole' as 'defined' and intended by
> >> the GPL) in disrespect of the GPL.
> 
> Good gravy, what a ludicrous claim.  You are a fscking idiot.

"Fsck you arsehole troll."

http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/2007/09/chrisv-liar.html

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)