[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:04:08 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> Hyman Rosen wrote:
> [...]
>> The version numbers on the source and binary links match.
> LOL!!! But what makes you think that it is a "complete corresponding
> source code" under the GNU GPL, silly Hyman?

If the sources did not build or work, the first user trying to do
something with them would notice.  If they build and work, there is
little point to make them build and work from different sources,
maintaining two trees with different functionality.

Calling something intentionally different a corresponding source without
it being so in order to fulfill licensing conditions would be active
fraud, not just negligence.

So you are claiming that Actiontec likely does parallel development of
equivalent functionality for the sole purpose of being able to be liable
for fraud.

And you call others silly...

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]