[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:10:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/19/2010 3:40 PM, RJack wrote:
Unverifiable settlement agreements are illusory.
After each case brought by the SFLC ended, the defendants
came into compliance with the GPL. This is verifiable, by
going to their websites and observing that the GPLed sources
are available.
- Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22