gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled


From: RJack
Subject: Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:40:41 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/19/2010 3:26 PM, RJack wrote:
For one wrongly decided non-precedential case:

Court vs. crank again.

How many times have you been told that unverifiable settlement agreements are imaginary?

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlement_%28litigation%29> The settlement of the lawsuit defines legal requirements of the parties, and is often put in force by an order of the court after a joint stipulation by the parties. In other situations (as where the claims have been satisfied by the payment of a certain sum of money) the plaintiff and defendant can simply file a notice that the case has been dismissed


Sorry Hyman. Unverifiable settlement agreements are illusory.
Claim all the unverifiable agreements you wish Hyman. People
are not foolish enough to prove a negative. If you claim a settlement
agreement then you produce it. Bullshit walks and money talks.


"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php

ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.

Sincerely,
RJack :)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]