[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

From: RJack
Subject: Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:40:41 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090812)

Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/19/2010 3:26 PM, RJack wrote:
For one wrongly decided non-precedential case:

Court vs. crank again.

How many times have you been told that unverifiable settlement agreements are imaginary?

<> The settlement of the lawsuit defines legal requirements of the parties, and is often put in force by an order of the court after a joint stipulation by the parties. In other situations (as where the claims have been satisfied by the payment of a certain sum of money) the plaintiff and defendant can simply file a notice that the case has been dismissed

Sorry Hyman. Unverifiable settlement agreements are illusory.
Claim all the unverifiable agreements you wish Hyman. People
are not foolish enough to prove a negative. If you claim a settlement
agreement then you produce it. Bullshit walks and money talks.

"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"


RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]