[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A simple question

From: RJack
Subject: Re: A simple question
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:18:30 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090812)

Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/21/2010 1:25 PM, RJack wrote:
How can someone infringe on another's copyrighted work without violating one the specific exclusive rights as described in sections 106 through 122 and section 106(A)? The answer to this question could resolve many disagreements among open source license

Why do you believe that someone is claiming copyright infringement outside of the enumerated rights of 17 USC 106? Even the FSF's wrong
 opinion about dynamic linking rests on the incorrect belief that it
 involves creating a derivative work, which is one of the enumerated
 exclusive rights. The claims are about copying and distributing
works without permission of their rights holders, just as in 17 USC

You seem very confused. Perhaps it is time for you to mention preemption again?

I was addressing the Jacobsen decision  and "rights" of attribution. Me
thinks *you're* confused. Moron.

RJack :)

"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]