[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

From: RJack
Subject: Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:40:38 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090812)

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Alexander Terekhov <> wrote:

Hyman Rosen wrote:

On 2/22/2010 1:13 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman, please formulate what is "enforceable copyright
condition", ...

Copying and distributing without permission from the rights
holders, with such permission expressed in the license they may

Hyman, why^W you're retardedly jumping to the conclusion bypassing
the analysis of condition v. covenant v. scope restriction
conundrum, why?

Perhaps because that's such an arcane, fine distinction that he's no
more interested in it than the judges were who judged Jacobsen vs.
Katzer. What matters is that the terms and conditions in the GPL are
legally valid, and have now been tested in an appeals court in the
United States of America.

Ummm... The Artistic license is now abbreviated "GPL". Hmm...

Alan is a poet and using poetic license...



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]