[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:20:07 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386))

RJack <> wrote:
> Hyman Rosen wrote:

> I've told you a hundred times that the Jacobsen appeals court panel
> violated CAFC rules.

If you were correct, a single time would suffice.

Here's the *valid* opinion:

[ .... ]

Sorry, Rjack, by definition the opinion of that appeals court is the
valid one.

Why can't you simply admit you've been mistaken on this issue for quite a
long time?  No shame in that, even the lower court got it wrong to begin

> Sincerely,
> RJack :)

Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]