[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:52:10 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> But throwing out the whole "AGB" part does not help the defendant one
>> bit, so there was likely nothing to be gained by contesting this part of
>> the reasoning.
> Das Gericht hat rechtsfehlerhafter Weise die 
> Prüfung eines Verstoßes von Art.81 EGV u. §1 GWB 
> unterlassen. 
> Das Urteil ist diesbezüglich *offensichtlich* falsch, denn 
> einerseits wird die GPL als AGB bezeichnet, andererseits 
> aber wie ein Individualrechtsgeschäft (read: Individualvertrag) 
> behandelt, um den §139 BGB anwenden zu können. So geht es nicht!

"diesbezüglich" means "in this respect".  I am not disagreeing with this
part of the comment for which you give no source.  But going to appeal
in order to get the right verdict for all the right reasons instead of
the same right verdict for some wrong reasons as well is likely of
little interest to the defendant.

An upright defending lawyer would probably tell his client "we could
likely contest this part successfully, but it would not change the

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]