[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:54:28 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0

On 2/22/2010 6:48 PM, RJack wrote:
The Artistic License broadly *permits* copying and distribution just as
Judge White originally found when he applied the correct Supreme Court
precedents. Contractual covenants aren't grant conditioners. No end runs
around the Supreme Court Hyman.

The Artistic License permits copying and distribution as long
as certain conditions are met when doing so. The appeals court
properly found that failing to abide by these conditions is
copyright infringement.

As I said a long time ago when Judge White made his original
decision and before he was overruled by CAFC, get back to me
once the Supreme Court overturns this.

Meanwhile, it's court vs. crank. And court wins.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]