Re: SFLC is SOL

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > This means that the SFLC cannot file a vouluntary dismissal without
> >> > the permission of Best Buy Inc.
> >>
> >> There is no such thing as "filing an unvoluntary dismissal".
> >
> > Uh retard dak.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_dismissal
> >
> > "Involuntary dismissal is the termination of a court case despite the
> > plaintiff's objection.
> 
> And just how (and why) would a plaintiff actually _file_ an involuntary
> dismissal?  I never said there _was_ no such thing as an involuntary
> dismissal, but it certainly can't be _filed_ by a party.

Defendant is also a party, oh paragon of GNU intellegence dak. Such
filing is called "a motion for involuntary dismissal" v. "a motion for
voluntary dismissal". Got it now, uh silly dak. 

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)