|
From: | Hyman Rosen |
Subject: | Re: Versa asserts joint ownership/indispensable party defense |
Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:07:33 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 3/9/2010 7:17 AM, RJack wrote:
Actually BusyBox is a thousand headed Hydra of derivative work - joint work compilations. After ten thousand patches BusyBox is a huge kettle of spaghetti code with fifty authors that is so entangled that even Humpty Dumpty's maintainers can never untangle it again.
It is not a joint work because all of its authors have not declared that it it is a joint work. As a derivative work, any of its authors may file for infringement.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |