[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:08:01 -0000 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) |
In gnu.misc.discuss RJack <user@example.net> wrote:
> If you are so smart at interpreting the Federal Rules of Civil
> Procedure, why are you so dumb at grasping doctrines like preemption
> and promissory estoppel?
> Could it be that you actually know the GPL is preempted and thus GPL
> code is quasi-public domain due to promissory estoppel? Perhaps your
> feigned ignorance is just stubbornness (like Hyman Rosen)?
You know, RJack, if you actually believed what you spout on this list,
you wouldn't be shouting so loudly "the sun's going to come up tomorrow".
If you actually believed it, you'd be quietly confident of the outcome,
and await it with patience. As it is, you're clearly trying to persuade
yourself. Best of luck with that!
> Sincerely,
> RJack :)
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04