Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 3/10/2010 11:18 AM, RJack wrote:
> > Sigh... That's nothing new. If conditions precedent are not
> > satisfied in a proprietary license the same thing results. The
> > Artistic license had no conditions precedent -- only covenants. One
> > erroneous decision by a non-precedental court is hardly a victory.
> > The CAFC's clear error can never harm anyone other than Katzer.
>
> It's only an error when a court superior to CAFC declares it such.
> Until then, it stands.

Limited strictly to one defendant in a nation of 310 million.

ROFL

Sincerely,
RJack :)