[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:08:24 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0

On 3/10/2010 12:21 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
doesn't even use the magic word "condition"!

So much about CAFC's

"The Artistic License states on its face that the document creates
conditions: "The intent of this document is to state the _conditions_
under which a Package may be copied." (Emphasis added.)"

It still contains "provided that", which
    Under California contract law, "provided that"
    typically denotes a condition.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]