|
From: | Hyman Rosen |
Subject: | Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption |
Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:08:37 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 3/11/2010 3:26 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In the system I envisage, such wouldn't normally be necessary, except in complicated cases.
Pretty much the definition of naive. There is already small-claims court for very small cases. But generally both sides in a dispute will want the most able advocates they can get, and they will continue to want that no matter what system is in place to adjudicate disputes.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |