[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mining the Blogosphere
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Mining the Blogosphere |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:16 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
RJack <user@example.net> writes:
> It is amazing to watch the communication strategy that Free Software
> advocates utilize in promoting their socialist goals. The FSF and SFLC
> have created an efficient network of Astroturf sites that is dedicated
> to promoting their goals. Moglen, Perens, Khun, Lessig and a growing
> list of "advocates" routinely pop up and utter some pronouncement
> concerning the undefined concept known as "open source" or
> F/L/OSS. These utterances are then picked up and amplified throughout
> the Blogosphere and quickly assume an aura of invincible truth.
Feel free to do the same. Oh, you already do. Could there be a reason
why nobody picks _your_ utterances up?
> The fanfare and sheer volume of internet posts surrounding the
> announcement that the SFLC had filed suit against Best Buy and
> thirteen other corporations was impressive. I Googled [sflc "best buy"
> infringement] and received 67,400 hits (an unscientific but relevant
> search). Obviously the announcement was considered an important
> development. Best Buy countersued for a declaratory judgment of
> non-infringement. A judgment of non-infringement in favor of Best Buy
> would utterly demolish the myth of Richard Stallman's "copyleft"
> principle.
A lot of judgments happen one way or the other without earth-shattering
consequences. So there is even less reason to get all excited over
hypothetical judgments.
> So, how many blogs have noted this fact?
"fact" as a term for describing hypothetical consequences for a
hypothetical event is definitely not the normal use of the word.
> One poster to these news groups, amicus curious, aptly pointed out
> that the SFLC was probably going to be able to walk away with
> propaganda "victories" through voluntary dismissals until some company
> found it financially worthwhile to end the SFLC's legal charades. It
> appears that circumstance is well nigh at hand.
It's not like you would tire sounding that trumpet of doom. After a few
years of that, the excitement wears off a bit.
> I wonder how the Blogosphere will react to the death of "copyleft".
I recommend learning the use of the subjunctive mode when you are
spilling one of your wet fantasies.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: SFLC is SOL, (continued)
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, chrisv, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Moshe, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04