Re: SFLC is SOL

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 10:05 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Read a bit more than a couple of introductory paragraphs
>
> Nothing else you quote at all supports the notion that preemption has
> anything to do with the GPL. That's not surprising, since preemption
> has nothing to do with the GPL.

GPLv2:
  "b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
    whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
    part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
    parties under the terms of this License."


Supreme Court:

"[I]t goes without saying that a contract cannot bind a non-party".
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. 534 U.S.
279, 122 S.Ct. 754, 151 L.Ed.2d 755.

ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.

Sincerely,
RJack :)