Re: GPL misappropriation

[chrisv]

Peter Köhlmann wrote:

>Hadron quacked:
>
>> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Meaning that material originally licensed under the BSDL must remain
>>>> licensed under the BSDL (with just a few restrictions imposed on
>>>> binary-only form) and not hijacked by the GPL retards, you moron
>>>> Hyman.
>>>
>>> Seems like you don't understand the difference between copyleft and
>>> weak permissive licenses.
>> 
>> Wasn't it you who claimed all this was really easy to understand? And
>> yet months later you're still here fighting bitterly ....

Hey, you stupid asshole.  Fsckhead trolls, like "Alexander Terekhov",
who pretend not to understand something are not evidence that it is
difficult to understand.  *Obviously*

You just made a fscking jackass of yourself *again*, "Hadron"!

>Fighting bitterly? Really?
>
>Against the likes of Alexander there simply is no "fight"
>
>Cretins like him would not understand something as simple as "1+1 = 2"
>
>Do you actually claim that bullshitters like Alexander or "RJack" have 
>anything of value to add?
>Do you actually claim that those cretins are not oxygen thieves?

Of course "Hadron" will support the anti-GPL cranks.  They are on
"Hadron's" side of being pro-Micro$oft and anti-FOSS.