Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> particular sentence, _and_ your attribution to the BGH as source is
> accurate (for which I don't see any evidence but consider possible),

BGH Beschluss vom 06.10.1961 (2 StR 289/61) 
NJW 1961, 2266; BGHSt 16, 271

http://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=06.10.1961&Aktenzeichen=2%20StR%20289%2F61

> I will agree that _if_ it originated from the BGH 

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=%22sein+Gewahrsam%22

Go to doctor, silly dak.

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)