[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit
From: |
Moshe |
Subject: |
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:11:59 -0000 |
User-agent: |
40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.84 |
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:18:05 +0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:17:21 +0000, RonB wrote:
>
>> Calera had early success as a desktop Linux
>
> Err... Caldera... with the "d."
Caldera was actually a decent commercial distribution.
It wasn't fancy, but it was well tested and did more or less what
it claimed.
It was one of the first "click and go" distributions, in that the
defaults were good, the partitioning scheme was safe and
reasonable so a noob could actually install it with little fuss.
I still have the books around here some place.
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, (continued)
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RonB, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, spike1, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RonB, 2010/05/04
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04