[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang

From: RJack
Subject: Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:12:27 -0000
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20100228)

David Kastrup wrote:
RJack <> writes:

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
WHEREFORE, Defendant prays for the following relief:

1. That Plaintiffs take nothing by their Complaint; 2. That
Defendant be dismissed from this action with prejudice; 3. For
its costs of suit incurred herein; 4. For its attorney fees
incurred herein; and 5. For such other and further relief as the
Court may deem just and proper.


Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b)(1), Defendant demands trial by jury on all issues so triable.
It appears Captain Moglen didn't scare 'em out of the water after

That's typically the job of the court in the first hearings.  It's
not a general pattern in GPL compliance cases that the defendants
settle and come into compliance before even having first contact with
the court.

If their legal views were that unclouded, they would have avoided
having the matter of compliance move to a court in the first place.

Have another drink DAK.

RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]