[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:12:27 -0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux)

RJack <> writes:

> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> WHEREFORE, Defendant prays for the following relief:
>> 1. That Plaintiffs take nothing by their Complaint; 2. That Defendant
>> be dismissed from this action with prejudice; 3. For its costs of
>> suit incurred herein; 4. For its attorney fees incurred herein; and
>> 5. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and
>> proper.
>> Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b)(1), Defendant
>> demands trial by jury on all issues so triable.
> It appears Captain Moglen didn't scare 'em out of the water after all.

That's typically the job of the court in the first hearings.  It's not a
general pattern in GPL compliance cases that the defendants settle and
come into compliance before even having first contact with the court.

If their legal views were that unclouded, they would have avoided having
the matter of compliance move to a court in the first place.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]