Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/7/2010 1:37 PM, RJack wrote:
> > There is, of course, no link anywhere to BusyBox, v.0.60.3. for
> > which the plaintiffs Complaint claims infringement.
>
> Interesting that your "arguments" have devolved into outright lying
> instead of merely being wrong. Pointless, too, since it is so easy to
> refute them by reading the complaint 
> <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.
>
>
>
> The only mention of a particular version of BusyBox is 31. Mr.
> Andersen is, and at all relevant times has been, a copyright owner
> under United States copyright law in the FOSS software program known
> as BusyBox. See, e.g., “BusyBox, v.0.60.3.”, Copyright Reg. No.
> TX0006869051 (10/2/2008). Plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy is
> the corporate home for the BusyBox project and the designated
> copyright enforcement agent for Mr. Andersen with respect to BusyBox.

ROFL.
> The complaint does not allege that the defendants are distributing 
> this particular version
ROFL.

"Hyman says".

Hyman says, "We don't need to show no stinkin' link 'cause we just
mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooved the goalposts."

, and distributing any GPL-covered version
> of BusyBox is copyright infringement unless the sources are properly 
> supplied as specified by the GPL. The defendants are required to 
> supply the sources for the version they distribute

Sincerely,
RJack :)