Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[chrisv]

Hyman Rosen wrote:

>On 4/8/2010 3:18 PM, RJack wrote:
>> Post a verifiable settlement agreement or
>> admit the SFLC cut and ran.
>
>It is not necessary to "post a verifiable settlement agreement"
>and it is probably impossible to do so, since settlements are
>often kept private. It is only necessary to see that the SFLC
>demands compliance with the GPL, and that such compliance exists
>once the suit ends. That will be true of Comtrend once they get
>their broken links fixed, just as it has been true with every
>other defendant with whom the SFLC has settled.

Odd.  I tried the top one myself, yesterday, and it worked fine.
Today, it's not.