Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> Comply with a small number of clearly spelled out conditions, and you
>> are fine, breach, and you are in trouble.  It's not a particularly hard
>> concept unless you are a troll.
>
> Samsung (several other 'humongous' defendants aside for a moment):
>
> "Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claim for copyright infringement 
> is barred under at least the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as 
> Defendant was licensed and any copies alleged to be infringing were, 
> therefore, lawfully made."

Let's see the judge take them up on this and other allegations.  I
rather expect them to come into compliance and drop out of the suit via
that way rather than a ruling.

-- 
David Kastrup