[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:14:13 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
"amicus_curious" <acdc@sti.net> writes:
> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message
> rs3c97-ep1.ln1@news.eternal-september.org">news:rs3c97-ep1.ln1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> Answer : yes they are. And no amount of whining and freetardery will
>> change that.
>
> Things are not that simple, else, why have lawyers? If you, say, take
> a photograph of the Toledo skyline at nightfall and publish the image,
> you own the copyright to that image and no one can use it without your
> permission.
If you do that with the Paris skyline, however, you'll get sued by the
people having registered copyright for the light arrangement of the
Eiffel tower.
I am not joking.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: SFLC is SOL, (continued)
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Rex Ballard, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hadron, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, amicus_curious, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Rex Ballard, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04