[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:14:23 -0000

David Kastrup wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <> writes:
> > Correct statement is
> >
> >    The GPL *ILLEGALLY* purports to establishes a pool of software
> >
> > because the GPL purports to control the licensee's copyrights with
> > respect to "all third parties" (i.e. the world)
> No, you are confused again.  The GPL gives you permission to pass copies

Read 17 USC 109, idiot.

Western Digital:

"Plaintiffs claims are barred by the first sale doctrine."


"Plaintiffs’ claims for relief are barred by the First Sale


"As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each
claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’
claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the 
provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any 
copies alleged to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. "


P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]