Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[Hyman Rosen]

On 4/13/2010 10:40 AM, RJack wrote:
> The SFLC lawsuit claims that BusyBox 0.60.3 is the infringed work, as
> can easily be seen by reading the complaint,
> <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.
>
> The plaintiffs are required to make available with specificity (i.e.
> non-moving target) the registered version (v. 0.60.3) of the BusyBox
> source code used to create the binary which they allege is copied and
> distributed, not the source code to some other BusyBox version.

The SFLC lawsuit does not claim that BusyBox 0.60.3 is the infringed
work, as can easily be seen by reading the complaint,
<http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>.
The infringed work is "BusyBox". The defendants are required to make
available the version of the BusyBox source code used to create the
binary which they are copying and distributing.