[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:15:25 -0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> A promise to licensees availing themselves of the license.  Without any
> Uh retard dak.
> "by [blah-blah], you indicate your acceptance of this License"
> "It may be implied from the construction of the contract that the
> offeror has dispensed with the requirement of communication of
> acceptance ... acceptance may be inferred from conduct"

Yeah, you got it.  If the conduct does not show an attempt to honor any
of the licensing conditions, non-acceptance has to be assumed.

If, in contrast, we have an incomplete attempt of compliance (often
characterizable as "dragging their feet"), we are talking about
non-compliance instead.

Which of the two is in question might just be resolved in discovery.  In
the common case of a settlement and coming into compliance and absent of
additional interests/penalties, the resolution may never be done.

In a typical case, both complaint and defense will list arguments for
both of these possibilities.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]