Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/13/2010 2:22 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >> > Copies lawfully made fall under 17 USC 109
> >>
> >> Certainly.
> >
> > Right, to wit:
> >
> > http://www.terekhov.de/Samsung-Answer.pdf
> >
> > "As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each
> > claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’
> > claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the
> > provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any
> > copies alleged to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. "
> 
> You really have to stop confusing the arguments of either party as being
> legally relevant before the court says so.

Samsung listed TWENTY (20) legally relevant reasons why SFLC's complaint
is legally irrelevant, silly.

regards, 
alexander. 
       
P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)