[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compliance detection tool

From: John Hasler
Subject: Re: Compliance detection tool
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:17:05 -0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

RJack wrote:
> The erroneous non-precedential Jacobsen decision is strictly limited
> to the one past defendant in a nation of 310 million people. So...
> what's your point?

While it is not a binding precedent it is still a precedent which can
and will be cited.  Non-binding precedents are routinely cited in US
courts.  It is not "erroneous" unless a higher court says so.
John Hasler
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]