[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:03:39 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0

On 4/20/2010 4:55 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
"Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract
[1] Elements and Case Citations
(1)   Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract;
(2)   Plaintiff is not a party to the contract;
(3)   The parties to the contract intended that the contract primarily
or directly benefit plaintiff or a class of parties of which plaintiff
is a member;
(4)  The contract is breached;
(5)  Plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach.

Why are you describing this? In the U.S., there have been
no such suits with respect to the GPL or other open licenses.
The GPL itself is not such a license, but even if it were,
the only lawsuits have been brought by rights holders.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]