[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compliance detection tool
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Compliance detection tool |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:42:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/2010 5:08 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> > Just curious, in what sense is it "instructive"?
>>
>> One might otherwise believe that the anti-GPL crank position
>> is simply a different interpretation of law and circumstance
>> in an "agree to disagree" sort of way.
>
> Only silly freetards would tolerate utter nonsense such as
>
> "Thus, if the terms of the Artistic License allegedly violated are both
> covenants and conditions, they may serve to limit the scope of the
> license and are governed by copyright law."
That would make the defendants of this case silly freetards since they
heeded the verdict.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Compliance detection tool, (continued)
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04