[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

From: Andrew Haley
Subject: Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:10:54 -0000
User-agent: tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/ (x86_64))

In gnu.misc.discuss Raffael Cavallaro 
<> wrote:
> On 2010-03-21 22:14:30 -0400, Pascal J. Bourguignon said:
> My principal objection to the GPL is that its license requirements 
> regarding opening source code make it very unpopular with many 
> commercial developers, and therefore whenever possible, they choose 
> non-GPL alternatives.

The choose non-GPL alternatives because they want their software not
to be free, unlike the libraries they use.

> In short, I don't think GPL licensing gets you anything additional in 
> terms of getting code open sourced.

But history says otherwise.  For example, there's a lot of code in gcc
that is there because the customer was told that if they wanted their
gcc extension (custom back-end, front-end changes, etc) they'd have to
release it under the GPL.

> I think people should avoid GPL licensing their work as a pragmatic
> means of ensuring maximal adoption. Ironically, the FSF understood
> this dynamic which is why they created the Library GPL, now known as
> the Lesser GPL.

There's nothing ironic about it.  The FSF seeks to maximize freedom,
so licenses code whichever way works best.  Libraries sometimes have
different needs from applications.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]