[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Significance of the GP licence.
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 16:18:14 +0200

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 5/5/2010 8:11 AM, RJack wrote:
> > Please provide links to those US federal judges who *do not* "believe
> > the terms of the GPL can be ignored." I await with 'bated breath for
> > your documentation.
> Sure, here you are:
> <>
>      PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs,
>      v.
>      MYSQL AB, et al., Defendants.
>      ORDER
>      SARIS, District Judge.
>      ...
>      With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has
>      not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the

>      I am not persuaded based on this record that the release of the
>      Gemini source code in July 2001 didn't cure the breach.

Yes, the case was about alleged contract breach, you retard. NOT
("COUNT VIII Breach of Contract (GPL License)")

"                      COUNT VIII 
              Breach of Contract (GPL License)"

Take your meds Hyman, take your meds.


P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]