[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

From: RJack
Subject: Re: Significance of the GP licence.
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 14:14:46 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20100228)

Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 5/5/2010 10:18 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
the case was about alleged contract breach

It doesn't matter what the case was about. Your fellow crank asked
for links to "US federal judges who *do not* believe the terms of the
GPL can be ignored", and I provided a link to a US judge who shows in
her order that she does not believe that the terms of the GPL can be

"With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has not
demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or
irreparable harm. . . but the matter is one of fair dispute."

Even Glenn Beck couldn't spin this to mean an affirmation of the
validity of GPL terms. ROFL.

Of course you and your fellow cranks will disregard evidence which
contradicts your cherished but incorrect beliefs even when this
evidence is exactly what you asked for. That's what makes you cranks
after all.

ROFL. This, from a GNUtian moron who claims a copyright license is not a

RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]