Re: Significance of the GP licence.

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 5/5/2010 10:18 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > the case was about alleged contract breach
>
> It doesn't matter what the case was about. Your fellow crank asked
> for links to "US federal judges who *do not* believe the terms of the
> GPL can be ignored", and I provided a link to a US judge who shows in
> her order that she does not believe that the terms of the GPL can be
> ignored.

"With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has not
demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or
irreparable harm. . . but the matter is one of fair dispute."

Even Glenn Beck couldn't spin this to mean an affirmation of the
validity of GPL terms. ROFL.

> Of course you and your fellow cranks will disregard evidence which
> contradicts your cherished but incorrect beliefs even when this
> evidence is exactly what you asked for. That's what makes you cranks
> after all.

ROFL. This, from a GNUtian moron who claims a copyright license is not a
contract.

Sincerely,
RJack :)