Re: Justice draws nigh

[RJack]

David Kastrup wrote:
> RJack <user@example.net> writes:
>
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> > > On 5/13/2010 4:12 PM, RJack wrote:
> > > > Why didn't you include the full context highlighted above?
> > > Because it is irrelevant. The portion I quoted demonstrates a
> > > court saying that the registration of a copyright is a claim by
> > > the registrant to ownership of his part in the work, and does not
> > > make any statement with regards to ownership or lack of same by
> > > anyone else. The extra portions you quote neither contribute to
> > > nor refute this point, which is why I omitted them.
> > >
> > > > I am puzzled by your position. The defendants in Best Buy et.
> > > > al. have denied Andersen's ownership of BusyBox. The burden is
> > > > on Andersen to prove his ownership. What's your point? That the
> > > > SFLC and Andersen are blithering idiots when they can't prove
> > > > ownership of BusyBox?
> > > My position is that Erik Anderson is an owner of BusyBox, that
> > > his registration of copyright in BusyBox is valid, and that the
> > > claims by the defendants that Erik Anderson is not an owner of
> > > BusyBox are incorrect.
> > Claim away Hyman. There are bigger fools than you out there. The 
> > Birthers claim Obama was born in Kenya, Timbuktu and God knows 
> > where else.
>
> Whereas you do your best to sound like you were born about 1in south 
> from what one would ordinarily assume.

Cat piss in your Cheerios today?

Sincerely,
RJack :)

          Have a nice day DAK!
      _                         _
     |R|                       |R|
     |J|         /^^^\         |J|
    _|a|_      (| "o" |)      _|a|_
  _| |c| | _    (_---_)    _ | |c| |_
 | | |k| ||-|    _| |_    |-|| |k| | |
 |          |   /     \   |          |
  \        /  / /(. .)\ \  \        /
    \    /  / /  | . |  \ \  \    /
      \  \/ /    ||Y||    \ \/  /
       \__/      || ||      \__/
                 () ()
                 || ||
                ooO Ooo