Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues

[RJack]

David Kastrup wrote:

> A smoking gun is a smoking gun.  It is not against the law to carry 
> smoking guns on the premises of a murder.  It is nevertheless 
> something that you should have an outstandingly good explanation for
>  when talking to a jury.
>
> > Good luck convincing a jury of "substantial similarity" Hyman.

Good luck convincing the judge to instruct the jury that the burden of
proof is a "smoking gun" and not a preponderance of the evidence.

> Good luck convincing a jury that all you left in was the 
> (non-copyrightable) version string.

Left in what? The couple of million occcurences of non-registered,
non-identified random numbers?

This discussion is academic at best. Long, long before any jury would
hear any admissible evidence, Judge Scheindlin will have shredded and
discarded the GPL licnese.

Sincerely,
RJack :)