[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues

From: RJack
Subject: Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:40 -0000
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20100228)

David Kastrup wrote:

A smoking gun is a smoking gun. It is not against the law to carry smoking guns on the premises of a murder. It is nevertheless something that you should have an outstandingly good explanation for
 when talking to a jury.

Good luck convincing a jury of "substantial similarity" Hyman.

Good luck convincing the judge to instruct the jury that the burden of
proof is a "smoking gun" and not a preponderance of the evidence.

Good luck convincing a jury that all you left in was the (non-copyrightable) version string.

Left in what? The couple of million occcurences of non-registered,
non-identified random numbers?

This discussion is academic at best. Long, long before any jury would
hear any admissible evidence, Judge Scheindlin will have shredded and
discarded the GPL licnese.

RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]