[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:46 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2010/06/bilski-decision-major-disappointment.html
>
> -------
> Jun 28, 2010
>
> Bilski decision a major disappointment: doesn't invalidate even one
> software patent
Well, that's obviously false, since the decision _does_ invalidate the
Bilski patent itself.
It _is_ a pity that nothing else was covered. This is not "lost badly",
not even "lost", but there has been no relevant win, either, and it
would have seemed like an opportunity for it.
--
David Kastrup
- Freetards lost badly in Bilski, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski, Rick, 2010/12/09
- Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski, Clogwog, 2010/12/09
- Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski, JEDIDIAH, 2010/12/08
- Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Moglen's subbatical--what is he doing?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08