gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues


From: RJack
Subject: Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:51 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1

The (almost) most idiotic SFLC response so far. . .

The SFLC has filed a Memorandum *opposing* the Motion to Withdraw by
Westinghouse counsel. This, despite the fact that Westinghouse and it's
successors in interest have declared that they will not defend against
the suit and have withdrawn all authorization for legal counsel to
act. Apparently the SFLC believes it can *force* a defendant to appear
in a civil action even after the defendant has declared his intention to
default.

WHERE DID THESE SFLC GUYS GET THEIR LAW DEGREES? A Wheaties (Breakfast
of Champions) box top? Groklaw?

ROFL.

Sincerely,
RJack


-- “The GPL is a License, Not a Contract, Which is Why the Sky Isn't
Falling” -- Pamela Jones at Groklaw
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031214210634851

-- "Although the United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.  101-
1332, grants exclusive jurisdiction for infringement claims to the
federal courts, those courts construe copyrights as contracts and
turn to the relevant state law to interpret them."; Automation by
Design, Inc. v. Raybestos Products Co., 463 F.3d 749, (United
States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2006) --
http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/463/463.F3d.749.05-1172.html




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]