[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:01 -0000 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> 119, for a car with novel technology. Now let's take a look at what a
> specialized application standard is comprised of.
>
> <URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-2#Patent_holders>
Rather
http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/m2/Documents/m2-att1.pdf
http://www.mpegla.com/main/pages/CurrentPools_LightBox.aspx
http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/M2/Pages/Intro.aspx
Less than 119 US patents (from many Corps, not just one) that allegedly
can be enforced in US as of July 1, 2010. You may also count "DE"
entries...
What is your point, silly dak?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Freetards lost badly in Bilski, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski, Rick, 2010/12/09
- Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski, Clogwog, 2010/12/09
- Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski, JEDIDIAH, 2010/12/08
- Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's post-Bilski trash-talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Moglen's subbatical--what is he doing?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's subbatical--what is he doing?, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Moglen's subbatical--what is he doing?, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
Re: Freetards lost badly in Bilski, RayLopez99, 2010/12/09