[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:24 -0000 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> Fortunately, I have the SFLC fighting this fight for me.
> The suit against BestBuy and Insignia is still ongoing.
Best Buy's countersuit is ongoing as well you silly.
And, BTW, *Insignia* has legally nothing to do with Best Buy defendant
in the ongoing Busybox lawsuit.
"Best Buy Co., Inc. ("Best Buy"), erroneously sued in place of Best Buy
Stores, L.P. and BestBuy.Com, LLC, answers Software Freedom Conservancy,
Inc. and Erik Andersen?s ("Plaintiffs") Original Complaint ("Complaint")
as follows: ... COUNTERCLAIMS"
Stop being utter moron Hyman.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, 7, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08