[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:35 -0000

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 8/5/2010 11:18 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >
> > (VI.D.3. Section 117 Adaptations)
> Yes. That's not a "fair use" permission as the OP claimed.

It has nothing to do with fair use, silly Hyman.

Not heeding your GNUtian "conditions" (illegal and hence void part of
contractually imposed obligations aside for a moment) is a contract
breach, not copyright infringement.

The copyright act has nothing to do with your idiotic "conditions".

The idea that the "copyleft hack" of copyright act is enforceable by 
the copyright act itself is utterly moronic.


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]