[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:37 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1

On 8/5/2010 12:02 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
CAFC appears to be thoroughly confused

Unfortunately for you, your opinion that the court is
confused does nothing to vitiate its ruling. In the
battle of crank vs. court, crank loses.

To understand the concept of "conditions" see

Perhaps you should go lecture the court. Maybe you can
get the opinion reversed. Meanwhile, "Having determined
that the terms of the Artistic License are enforceable
copyright conditions" we can go forward assuming that
the GPL is a straightforward copyright license which
works just as it says it does.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]