Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

[Hyman Rosen]

On 8/5/2010 3:11 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Hyman Rosen is spin doctoring CAFC's Jacobsen opinion

The court ruled that the copyright conditions found in a specific
open license were indeed copyright conditions such that copying
without honoring them is copyright violation. This is cognitively
unacceptable to GPL cranks who have built their identity on asserting
the opposite, so they respond in various unconvincing ways, such as
by directing ad hominem attacks at the judge or by insisting that the
decision has no broad implications.