gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple


From: RJack
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:48 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1

On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 8/5/2010 3:11 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen is spin doctoring CAFC's Jacobsen opinion

The court ruled that the copyright conditions found in a specific
open license were indeed copyright conditions such that copying
without honoring them is copyright violation. This is cognitively
unacceptable to GPL cranks who have built their identity on asserting
the opposite, so they respond in various unconvincing ways, such as
by directing ad hominem attacks at the judge or by insisting that the
decision has no broad implications.


And the Artistic License is not the GPL license. This is cognitively
unacceptable to GPL crackpots on who have built their identity on
asserting false legal claims concerning the GPL license.

You should really direct your flawed arguments toward the Best Buy Inc.
legal claims:

***********************************************************************

FIRST COUNTERCLAIM
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

9. Best Buy restates and realleges each of the allegations set forth in
the Counterclaim paragraphs 1-8 above.
10. By filing the instant Complaint, Plaintiffs have purported to assert
a claim for copyright infringement by Best Buy of copyrights in BusyBox.
11. Best Buy has not infringed any copyrights in BusyBox.
12. Best Buy is entitled to judgment that it has not infringed any
copyrights in BusyBox.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Defendant/Counterclaimant Best Buy prays for judgment in its
favor against Plaintiffs/Counterclaimants as follows:

1. Dismissing Plaintiffs’ cause of action with prejudice and on the merits;
2. Declaring that Best Buy has not infringed the alleged copyrights in
BusyBox;
3. Awarding Best Buy its costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees,
incurred in connection with this matter; and
4. Awarding such other relief as this Court deems just and equitable.

***********************************************************************

You can kiss Erik Andersen's ass goodbye after he loses this one. The
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. http://www.rkmc.com/ is one
of the top law firms in the country and they aren't going to be cheap.

The FSF and the SFLC will have no more influence in the open source
community than my pet Cocker Spaniel. They'll be exposed for the
fraudulent clowns they are.

Sincerely,
RJack :)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]