[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A drunken judge in the SDNY

From: c_stuff
Subject: Re: A drunken judge in the SDNY
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:00:45 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2

On 8/22/2010 1:01 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

Of course not.  How is stating that you're mistaken got anything to
do with Erik Andersen?  More precisely, you're probably mistaken
about the applicability of the court decision you cited.  Anyhow, as
I've already said, if you're right, then the defendants will appeal
and get their money back.

Besides thin air, what's your basis for stating I'm mistaken? Even Hyman
Rosen attempts to document a few of his assertions.

The defendants may or may not appeal. That's a contingency.

RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]