[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:00:23 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
On 8/20/2010 12:19 PM, RJack wrote:
Yeah... exceptions such as the AFC's test for merger.
And can you point to any cases where a court has found
that such merger took place, for any significant work?
Or are you going to point the the few bytes of program
involved in the Lexmark case?
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, (continued)
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RayLopez99, 2010/12/09
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08