[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scan

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling)
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:01:21 -0000

You retard.

David Kastrup wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <> writes:
> > You idiot.
> >
> > Nothing you quoted suggests that CTA retained and used "upgrade" copies
> > (or sold them to someone else).
> And nothing I wrote suggests that either.  Try focusing.
> The problem was that CTA sold the media for the _original_ versions
> after obtaining upgrades to them that were licensed under condition that
> the _original_ media were being destroyed.

I, as an owner of multiple
( material objects (media of
navigation software), while taking vacation and visiting the territory
of the 9th Cir. jurisdiction, received from local
( representitive (in US) an
offer to buy the latest and greatest version at discounted price.

The fine print said that I must "destroy" all my navigons previously
bought from Navigon. 

Instead, I sold all my old navigons to the Ninth Circuit for 0.01 EURO.

Question: Am I guilty of trafficking in stolen goods?

Is Ninth Circuit also a criminal for using one of my old navigons?


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]