Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling)

[Snit]

JEDIDIAH stated in post slrni9fqtj.k3l.jedi@nomad.mishnet on 9/20/10 4:18
PM:

... 
>> Sorry, but bartering stolen or not legally usable goods is not something
> 
>     Stolen is not something that can be reasonably used interchangeably with
> something like "not legally usable". The only reason there is the slightest
> bit of problem with the transaction is that someone is trying to subvert a
> real right in favor of an artificial one and the courts are willing to go
> along.

What is a real right?  What is an artificial right?

... 
>     The architect's copy should not be treated any different than one
> sitting at Microcenter. It moves and the rights associated move along
> with it.

If you buy a ticket to an ongoing exhibit at a museum, do you think that
once you are done with it you should be able to pass it on to a friend... or
even sell it?

-- 
"A non-powered hub that will only  support non-powered devices. IOW,
basically useless." -- Tim Adams